Public answers on Consensise

275 multi-AI syntheses readers have chosen to publish.

ReviewList of References (APA 7th Edition) 1. Abhishek, A. (2023). An empirical analysis of impact of XBRL on quality of financial reporting in India. Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting, 21(4), 810–828. 2. Akerlof, G. A. (1970). The market for "lemons": Quality uncertainty and the market mechanism. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 84(3), 488–500. 3. Alqatamin, R. M., & Alqatamin, M. (2024). Audit committee characteristics and financial reporting quality: Evidence from the emerging market. Journal of Governance and Regulation, 13(2), 150–163. 4. Ball, R., & Brown, P. (1968). An empirical evaluation of accounting income numbers. Journal of Accounting Research, 6(2), 159–178. 5. Barth, M. E., Landsman, W. R., & Lang, M. H. (2008). International Accounting Standards and accounting quality. Journal of Accounting Research, 46(3), 467–498. 6. Dechow, P. M., & Dichev, I. D. (2002). The quality of accruals and earnings: The role of accrual estimation errors. The Accounting Review, 77(s-1), 35–59. 7. Dechow, P. M., Ge, W., & Schrand, C. (2010). Understanding earnings quality: A review of the proxies, their determinants and their consequences. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 50(2-3), 344–401. 8. Dechow, P. M., Sloan, R. G., & Sweeney, A. P. (1995). Detecting earnings management. The Accounting Review, 70(2), 193–225. 9. DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160. 10. Etengu, R., et al. (2026). Corporate governance mechanisms and financial reporting quality: Evidence from quoted manufacturing firms. African Journal of Accounting and Finance, 14(1), 45–62. 11. Fama, E. F., & Jensen, M. C. (1983). Separation of ownership and control. The Journal of Law and Economics, 26(2), 301–325. 12. Fang, J., He, L., Meng, Y., & Ye, K. (2022). Supervision or collusion? CEO-CFO social ties and financial reporting quality. Journal of Corporate Finance, 72, 102150. 13. Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB). (2010). Statement of Financial Accounting Concepts No. 8: Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting. FASB. 14. Healy, P. M., & Wahlen, J. M. (1999). A review of the earnings management literature and its implications for standard setting. Accounting Horizons, 13(4), 365–383. 15. International Accounting Standards Board (IASB). (2018). Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting. IFRS Foundation. 16. Irawan, D., Rachmawati, S., & Silvarajoo, J. (2025). Factors driving the quality of financial reporting in non-financial public companies in Indonesia. Asian Journal of Business and Accounting, 18(1), 112–140. 17. Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360. 18. Johri, A. (2024). Examining the impact of IFRS adoption on financial reporting quality of multinational companies. Global Business Review, 25(3), 612–630. 19. Karunananda, A., Azam, M., & Yusoff, W. (2025). The impact of financial reporting quality (FRQ) on decision-usefulness: A case of investors in Sri Lanka. Global Business & Finance Review, 30(1), 88–105. 20. Kothari, S. P., Leone, A. J., & Wasley, C. E. (2005). Performance matched discretionary accrual measures. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 39(1), 163–197. 21. Lisboa, I., Costa, J., & Reis, M. (2025). Financial reporting quality impact on the firm's capital structure. Review of Accounting and Finance, 24(2), 201–222. 22. Myers, S. C., & Majluf, N. S. (1984). Corporate financing and investment decisions when firms have information that investors do not have. Journal of Financial Economics, 13(2), 187–221. 23. Ohlson, J. A. (1995). Earnings, book values, and dividends in equity valuation. Contemporary Accounting Research, 11(2), 661–687. 24. Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (1978). The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective. Harper & Row. 25. Reis, M. (2023). Financial reporting quality impact on the firm's capital structure (Master's thesis, University of Minho). 26. Roychowdhury, S. (2006). Earnings management through real activities manipulation. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 42(3), 335–370. 27. Spence, M. (1973). Job market signaling. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 87(3), 355–374. 28. Staubus, G. J. (1961). A Theory of Accounting to Investors. University of California Press. 29. Tawiah, V., & Borgi, H. (2022). Impact of XBRL adoption on financial reporting quality: A global evidence. International Journal of Accounting & Information Management, 30(4), 480–505. 30. Tran, T., & Dang, V. (2026). A meta-analytic review of the impact of financial reporting quality on firm value and performance. Journal of Accounting Literature, 44(1), 78–104. 31. Watts, R. L., & Zimmerman, J. L. (1978). Towards a positive theory of the determination of accounting standards. The Accounting Review, 53(1), 112–134. 32. Watts, R. L., & Zimmerman, J. L. (1986). Positive Accounting Theory. Prentice-Hall. 33. Yahaya, A. (2026). Moderating role of audit quality in the gender diversity-reporting quality relationship. Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies, 16(2), 230–252. 34. Yousaf, M., & Mahmood, A. (2026). Audit committee characteristics and financial reporting quality of listed firms. Journal of Accounting, Finance & Business Insights, 5(1), 33–50. Kindly search for the above refrences and provide their DOI AskWhy can't i update a document here AskIn a nut shell what research topic are you suggesting WriteKindly brainstorm and restructure the proposed tiltle to be more focus and direct , note , title that have not been authored before and a very interesting area ReviewProposed Title From Cyber Risk to Investment Decisions: Board Oversight and Management Control Systems in Cybersecurity Investment A Critical Review of Emerging Econom Ask你係Apple Specialist 我而家用緊iPad mini A17 Pro WiFi 256GB，得返33GB容量。而家想trade in 咗佢換iPad mini A20 Pro Cellular, 但未諗到究竟應該要256GB定512GB，你點睇？ Ask过程叙述详细 Ask详细拆分过程 Ask我如何自己做一个类似Consensise的多模型对比平台（先做网页版即可） Factcheckbest AI model in world Debatebest AI model in world Debatehello AskWhat are the main arguments against breakfast being the most important meal? AskCan you give me a good research proposal idea on entrepreneurship WriteKindly prove me with a professinal academic critique format template Askمنين اروح للعدادا AskGDS 2nd Merit AskAdv.415 2026 AskWhat is the official announcement date for the GSSSB Junior Pharmacist results? Ask210 marks exam Hati , expected Result Date , Expected cut off catagory vise

Home · About · Sitemap

By continuing you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy
Assessment
Details

Answer

Key Claims

Permanent Action

Delete Your Account

Your account is shared across Consensable and Consensise. Deleting it permanently removes your data on both products. This cannot be undone.

If you change your mind, and your account will remain intact.

History

⌕

Explore

⌕

Examples

Tap any example to try it.

Simple, transparent pricing

Pay for what you use. No hidden fees.

Free
$0
300
credits / month
  • ✓Fast preset
  • ✓Free credits valid 1 month
  • ✓Public questions
Most Popular
Plus
$5.99/mo
3,000
credits / month
Everything in Free, and:
  • ✓All presets — Fast, Balanced, Thinking, Custom
  • ✓All lengths — Short, Medium, Long, Custom
  • ✓Private questions
  • ✓Citations in articles
Pro
$23.99/mo
13,200
credits / month
Everything in Plus, and:
  • ✓API access
  • ✓Webhooks

Prices in USD, excl. tax. Local currency and applicable taxes calculated at checkout.

Full feature comparison

FeatureFreePlusPro
Usage
Monthly credits3003,00013,200
Privacy
Private questions—✓✓
Citations in articles—✓✓
Answer length
Short✓✓✓
Medium—✓✓
Long—✓✓
Custom length (write mode)—✓✓
AI Models
Presets availableFastFast, Balanced & ThinkingFast, Balanced & Thinking
Custom model set—✓✓
Developer
API access——✓
Webhook support——✓

How credits work

Credits are how Consensable measures AI usage. Each query consumes credits based on the models used, discussion rounds, and whether web search is enabled.

Transparent pricing

1 credit = $0.001 AI cost. Credits map directly to real AI model usage costs.

Long validity

Free credits expire after 1 month. Paid credits last 1 year (monthly plans + top-ups), or 3 years on annual plans. Buy more or upgrade at any time.

Full visibility

You'll always see exactly how many credits a query used and how many you have remaining.

Top-up packs available

Need more mid-month? Buy credit packs any time. Packs: 3,000 for $5.99 · 13,200 for $23.99.

Multi-AI consensus, unlimited.

Submit as many queries as you like. Each tier unlocks larger AI panels and longer outputs. Save ~17% with annual billing.

Starter
$0
  • ✓3-AI panel
  • ✓Short answers
  • ✓Public results
Essential
$4.99/mo
Everything in Starter, and:
  • ✓Priority queue
  • ✓3 or 4-AI panels
  • ✓Short or Medium answers
  • ✓Private results
Most Popular
Premium
$9.99/mo
Everything in Essential, and:
  • ✓Super priority
  • ✓Up to 5-AI panel
  • ✓Custom AI panel (pick your own models)
  • ✓Short, Medium, Long or Custom answers

Prices in USD, excl. tax. Local currency and applicable taxes calculated at checkout.

Full feature comparison

FeatureStarterEssentialPremium
Usage
QueriesUnlimitedUnlimitedUnlimited
AI Panels
3-AI panel✓✓✓
4-AI panel—✓✓
5-AI panel——✓
Custom panel (pick models)——✓
Answer length
Short✓✓✓
Medium—✓✓
Long——✓
Custom——✓
Privacy
Public results✓✓✓
Private results—✓✓
Queue priority
QueueStandardPrioritySuper
Your task has been submitted. You will be notified as soon as it's processed.
Loading...
In Consensise, jobs are queued and open-source AI models that do not browse the web are used. For near real-time responses, commercial AI models, or current-affairs queries, consider the credit-based Consensable.

My Jobs

Loading...